![]() Is the rationale for the proposed study clear and valid?.Peer review aims to ensure that the proposed research is rigorous, that the methodology and analysis are sound, and that the resulting study will meet the criteria for publication. You’ll review a manuscript reporting the methods and findings of the study originally outlined in the Registered Report Protocol. You’ll review a manuscript reporting the study design, rationale, timeline, proposed methodology for data collection and analysis, and where applicable, ethical approval for the work. Assessment takes place in two stages and, if accepted, results in two linked publications. The PLOS ONE publication criteria apply to Registered Reports as they would to any other research submitted to the journal, but the peer review process is slightly different. Registered Reports are primary research articles in which the methods and proposed analyses are peer reviewed prior to conducting experiments, data collection or analysis. The article adheres to appropriate reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability.The research meets all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity.The article is presented in an intelligible fashion and is written in standard English.Conclusions are presented in an appropriate fashion and are supported by the data.Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail.Results reported have not been published elsewhere.The study presents the results of primary scientific research.To be accepted for publication in PLOS ONE, research articles must satisfy the following criteria: Please carefully review our seven editorial criteria for publication as the criteria employed by PLOS ONE are quite different to other journals you may have reviewed for. Unlike many journals which attempt to use the peer review process to determine whether or not an article reaches the level of 'importance' required by a given journal, PLOS ONE uses peer review to determine whether a paper is technically rigorous and meets the scientific and ethical standard for inclusion in the published scientific record. If you have confidential concerns relating to publication or research ethics, please contact us at for publication PLOS ONE does not allow confidential comments other than the declaration of competing interests. This will not play any role in the editorial decision-making process or be shared with the authors. You’ll also have the option to list anyone who collaborated with you on the peer review, and indicate whether you think the submission should be highlighted on the PLOS ONE webpage if it goes on to be published. Use this section to declare any potential or perceived competing interests. Enter the main text of your peer review in question 5, “Review Comments to the Author.” Comments to the editor For questions 1-4 select a response from the drop down (e.g., “Yes,” “No,” “I don't know,” “N/A”) and provide any details you wish. The form contains two sections: Comments to the authorĪnswers to the questions in this section are required and will be included in the decision letter to the author. PLOS ONE uses a structured reviewer form to help reviewers focus on our publication criteria and improve the efficiency of peer review. How to Submit a Peer Review in Editorial Manager ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |